Bite or flight? Behavioral interactions between bark anoles and brown anoles in their nonnative range
Corresponding Author
I. T. Clifton
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Correspondence
Ian T. Clifton, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th St., Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorN. D. Gripshover
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorA. G. Amador
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorW. Aquino
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Fernandez
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorM. Mathieu
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorA. Menendez
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorC. Quintana
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorS. Rhoades
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorG. Suarez
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorC. L. Cox
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Institute of the Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
I. T. Clifton
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Correspondence
Ian T. Clifton, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th St., Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorN. D. Gripshover
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorA. G. Amador
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorW. Aquino
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Fernandez
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorM. Mathieu
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorA. Menendez
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorC. Quintana
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorS. Rhoades
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorG. Suarez
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorC. L. Cox
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Institute of the Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Search for more papers by this authorEditor: Matthew Hayward
Associate Editor: Diego Astúa
Abstract
Both intra- and interspecific interactions play crucial roles in defining the structure of ecological communities. However, the specific behavioral processes underlying this structuring are often unclear and must be inferred from contemporary interactions. Rapid spread of nonnative species has resulted in increasingly homogenized communities, and this homogenization provides an excellent opportunity to study the behavioral processes that lead to stable communities of introduced species in novel habitats. Here, we compared the behavior of brown anoles (Anolis sagrei) and bark anoles (A. distichus) when faced with an incursion by an unknown brown anole to examine the intra- and interspecific interactions underlying the structuring of novel communities in South Florida, USA. We found that brown anoles were consistently more aggressive toward intruders than bark anoles, and this pattern was accentuated when they encountered intruders of the same sex. Conversely, bark anoles were likely to flee when they encountered intruder brown anoles. We also found that brown anoles were likely to attack intruders regardless of whether they engaged in aggressive behavioral displays while bark anoles were likely to flee regardless of whether the intruder engaged in behavioral displays. Our findings suggest that behavioral interactions could play a significant role in structuring the novel Anolis communities in South Florida and demonstrate the importance of aggressive interactions both within and between species.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
jzo13094-sup-0001-TableS1.docxWord 2007 document , 13.7 KB |
Table S1 Results of campus-wide surveys of MMC for lizard species. A total of 538 lizards were observed across 26 survey transects between 11 March 2021 and 7 April 2021. All surveys were conducted between 1100 and 1800 h. The number in parentheses indicates the percentage of the total sample represented by each species and sex. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Bentz, A. B., Philippi, K. J., & Rosvall, K. A. (2019). Evaluating seasonal patterns of female aggression: Case study in a cavity-nesting bird with intense female–female competition. Ethology, 125, 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12881
- Brown, W. L., Jr., & Wilson, E. O. (1956). Character displacement. Systematic Zoology, 5, 49–64.
- Bush, J. M., Ellison, M., & Simberloff, D. (2022). Impacts of an invasive species (Anolis sagrei) on social and spatial behaviours of a native congener (Anolis carolinensis). Animal Behaviour, 183, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.06.006
- Campbell, S. E., & Mandrak, N. E. (2019). Temporal dynamics of taxonomic homogenization in the fish communities of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Diversity and Distributions, 25, 1870–1878. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12986
- Chesson, P. (2000). Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 343–366.
- Cisterne, A., Schwarzkopf, L., & Pike, D. A. (2018). Australian house geckos are more aggressive than a globally successful invasive Asian house gecko. Behavioral Ecology, 30, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary156
- Connell, J. H. (1983). On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: Evidence from field experiments. The American Naturalist, 122, 661–696. https://doi.org/10.1086/284165
- Cooper, W. E., & Vitt, L. J. (1987). Intraspecific and interspecific aggression in lizards of the scincid genus Eumeces: Chemical detection of conspecific sexual competitors. Herpetologica, 43, 7–14.
- Culbertson, K. A., & Herrmann, N. C. (2019). Asymmetric interference competition and niche partitioning between native and invasive Anolis lizards. Oecologia, 190, 811–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04466-1
- Deckel, A. W. (1995). Laterality of aggressive responses in Anolis. The Journal of Experimental Zoology, 272, 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402720304
- Edwards, J. R., & Lailvaux, S. P. (2013). Do interspecific interactions between females drive shifts in habitat use? A test using the lizards Anolis carolinensis and A. sagrei. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 110, 843–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12180
- Eurich, J. G., McCormick, M. I., & Jones, G. P. (2018). Habitat selection and aggression as determinants of fine-scale partitioning of coral reef zones in a guild of territorial damselfishes. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 587, 201–215. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12458
- Finke, D. L., & Snyder, W. E. (2008). Niche partitioning increases resource exploitation by diverse communities. Science, 321, 1488–1490. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160854
- Fisher, S. R., Del Pinto, L. A., & Fisher, R. N. (2020). Establishment of brown anoles (Anolis sagrei) across a southern California county and potential interactions with a native lizard species. PeerJ, 8, e8937. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8937
- Freeman, B. G., Class Freeman, A. M., & Hochachka, W. M. (2016). Asymmetric interspecific aggression in new Guinean songbirds that replace one another along an elevational gradient. Ibis, 158, 726–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12384
- Gelman, A., & Su, Y.-S. (2022). Arm: Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=arm
- Gotelli, N. J., & Arnett, A. E. (2000). Biogeographic effects of red fire ant invasion. Ecology Letters, 3, 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00138.x
- Grant, P. R., & Grant, B. R. (2006). Evolution of character displacement in Darwin's finches. Science, 313, 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128374
- Grenier-Potvin, A., Clermont, J., Gauthier, G., & Berteaux, D. (2021). Prey and habitat distribution are not enough to explain predator habitat selection: Addressing intraspecific interactions, behavioural state and time. Movement Ecology, 9, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-021-00250-0
- Grether, G. F., Peiman, K. S., Tobias, J. A., & Robinson, B. W. (2017). Causes and consequences of behavioral interference between species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32, 760–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.07.004
- Hews, D. K., Castellano, M., & Hara, E. (2004). Aggression in females is also lateralized: Left-eye bias during aggressive courtship rejection in lizards. Animal Behaviour, 68, 1201–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.11.024
- Hews, D. K., & Worthington, R. A. (2001). Fighting from the right side of the brain: Left visual field preference during aggression in free-ranging male tree lizards Urosaurus ornatus. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 58, 356–361. https://doi.org/10.1159/000057576
- Hobbs, J. P. A., & Munday, P. L. (2004). Intraspecific competition controls spatial distribution and social organisation of the coral-dwelling goby Gobiodon histrio. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 278, 253–259. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps278253
- Hutchinson, G. E. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? The American Naturalist, 93, 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1086/282070
- Iglesias-Carrasco, M., Brookes, S., Kruuk, L. E. B., & Head, M. L. (2020). The effects of competition on fitness depend on the sex of both competitors. Ecology and Evolution, 10, 9808–9826. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6620
- Jaeger, R. G. (1981). Dear enemy recognition and the costs of aggression between salamanders. The American Naturalist, 117, 962–974. https://doi.org/10.1086/283780
- Jankowski, J. E., Robinson, S. K., & Levey, D. J. (2010). Squeezed at the top: Interspecific aggression may constrain elevational ranges in tropical birds. Ecology, 91, 1877–1884. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2063.1
- Jenssen, T. A., Hovde, K. A., & Taney, K. G. (1998). Size-related habitat use by nonbreeding Anolis carolinensis lizards. Copeia, 1998, 774–779. https://doi.org/10.2307/1447814
- Kamath, A., & Losos, J. (2017). The erratic and contingent progression of research on territoriality: A case study. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2319-z
- Kamath, A., Stuart, Y. E., & Campbell, T. S. (2013). Behavioral partitioning by the native lizard Anolis carolinensis in the presence and absence of the invasive Anolis sagrei in Florida. Breviora, 535(1), 1–10.
- Keren-Rotem, T., Bouskila, A., & Geffen, E. (2006). Ontogenetic habitat shift and risk of cannibalism in the common chameleon (Chamaeleo chamaeleon). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0102-z
- King, W., & Krakauer, T. (1966). The exotic herpetofauna of Southeast Florida. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences, 29, 144–154.
- Kolbe, J. J., Glor, R. E., Rodríguez Schettino, L., Lara, A. C., Larson, A., & Losos, J. B. (2004). Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature, 431, 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02807
- Krijger, C. L., Peters, Y. C., & Sevenster, J. G. (2001). Competitive ability of neotropical drosophila predicted from larval development times. Oikos, 92, 325–332.
- Krysko, K. L., Enge, K. M., & Moler, P. E. (2019). Amphibians and reptiles of Florida. University of Florida Press.
- Krysko, K. L., Somma, L. A., Smith, D. C., Gillette, C. R., Cueva, D., Wasilewski, J. A., Enge, K. M., Johnson, S. A., Campbell, T. S., & Edwards, J. R. (2016). New verified nonindigenous amphibians and reptiles in Florida, 1976 through 2015, with a summary of over 152 years of introductions. Reptiles & Amphibians, 23, 110–143.
- Lailvaux, S. P., & Irschick, D. J. (2007). The evolution of performance-based male fighting ability in Caribbean Anolis lizards. The American Naturalist, 170, 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1086/521234
- Little, K., Draud, M., & Itzkowitz, M. (2013). Interspecific aggression in two highly similar Stegastes damselfish. Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 25, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2012.745451
- Losos, J. B., Jackman, T. R., Larson, A., Queiroz, K., & Rodriguez-Schettino, L. (1998). Contingency and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of Island lizards. Science, 279, 2115–2118. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5359.2115
- MacGregor-Fors, I., Morales-Pérez, L., Quesada, J., & Schondube, J. E. (2010). Relationship between the presence of house sparrows (Passer domesticus) and Neotropical bird community structure and diversity. Biological Invasions, 12, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9432-5
- McKinney, M. L., & Lockwood, J. L. (1999). Biotic homogenization: A few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 450–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01679-1
- McMann, S., & Paterson, A. (2012). Display behavior of resident brown anoles (Anolis sagrei) during close encounters with neighbors and non-neighbors. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 7, 27–37.
- Moreira, P. L., López, P., & Martín, J. (2008). Discrimination of conspecific faecal chemicals and spatial decisions in juvenile Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta monticola). Acta Ethologica, 11, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-007-0038-6
- Myrberg, A. A., Jr., & Thresher, R. E. (1974). Interspecific aggression and its relevance to the concept of territoriality in reef fishes. American Zoologist, 14, 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/14.1.81
- Nakano, S., & Furukawa-Tanaka, T. (1994). Intra- and interspecific dominance hierarchies and variation in foraging tactics of two species of stream-dwelling chars. Ecological Research, 9, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347237
- Narváez, A. E., Ghia, T., Moretta-Urdiales, M. M., & Moreira, N. M. (2020). Feeding habits of Anolis sagrei, an introduced species, in urban ecosystems of Guayas Province. Urban Ecosystem, 23, 1371–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00979-3
- Norval, G., Bursey, C. R., Goldberg, S. R., Mao, J.-J., & Slater, K. (2011). Origin of the helminth community of an exotic invasive lizard, the brown anole, Anolis sagrei (Squamata: Polychrotidae), Southwestern Taiwan. Pacific Science, 65(5), 383–390.
- Olden, J. D. (2006). Biotic homogenization: A new research agenda for conservation biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 2027–2039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01572.x
- Pacala, S., & Roughgarden, J. (1982). Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in two two-species insular Anolis lizard communities. Science, 217, 444–446. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.217.4558.444
- Paterson, A. V. (1999). Effects of prey availability on perch height of female bark anoles, Anolis distichus. Herpetologica, 55, 242–247.
- Paterson, A. V. (2002). Effects of an individual's removal on space use and behavior in territorial neighborhoods of brown anoles (Anolis sagrei). Herpetologica, 58, 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1655/0018-0831(2002)058[0382:Eoairo]2.0.Co;2
- Pröhl, H., Scherm, M. G., Meneses, S., Dreher, C. E., Meuche, I., & Rodríguez, A. (2019). Female–female aggression is linked to food defence in a poison frog. Ethology, 125, 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12848
- R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org/
- Reedy, A. M., Pope, B. D., Kiriazis, N. M., Giordano, C. L., Sams, C. L., Warner, D. A., & Cox, R. M. (2017). Female anoles display less but attack more quickly than males in response to territorial intrusions. Behavioral Ecology, 28, 1323–1328. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx095
- Robertson, D. R. (1996). Interspecific competition controls abundance and habitat use of territorial Caribbean damselfishes. Ecology, 77, 885–899. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265509
- Robinson, S. K., & Terborgh, J. (1995). Interspecific aggression and habitat selection by Amazonian birds. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/5822
- Salzburg, M. A. (1984). Anolis sagrei and Anolis cristatellus in southern Florida: A case study in interspecific competition. Ecology, 65, 14–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939453
- Savolainen, R., & Vepsäläinen, K. (1988). A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: Impact on resource partitioning and community structure. Oikos, 51, 135–155.
- Schluter, D. (2000). Ecological character displacement in adaptive radiation. The American Naturalist, 156, S4–S16. https://doi.org/10.1086/303412
- Sinervo, B., & Lively, C. M. (1996). The rock–paper–scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature, 380, 240–243. https://doi.org/10.1038/380240a0
- Stamps, J. A. (1977). The relationship between resource competition, risk, and aggression in a tropical territorial lizard. Ecology, 58, 349–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935609
- Stamps, J. A. (1983). The relationship between ontogenetic habitat shifts, competition and predator avoidance in a juvenile lizard (Anolis aeneus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00296929
- Stuart, Y. E., Campbell, T. S., Hohenlohe, P. A., Reynolds, R. G., Revell, L. J., & Losos, J. B. (2014). Rapid evolution of a native species following invasion by a congener. Science, 346, 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257008
- Svanbäck, R., Eklöv, P., Fransson, R., & Holmgren, K. (2008). Intraspecific competition drives multiple species resource polymorphism in fish communities. Oikos, 117, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16267.x
- Tokarz, R. R. (1985). Body size as a factor determining dominance in staged agonistic encounters between male brown anoles (Anolis sagrei). Animal Behaviour, 33, 746–753.
- Tokarz, R. R., & Beck, J. W. (1987). Behaviour of the suspected lizard competitors Anolis sagrei and Anolis carolinensis: An experimental test for behavioural interference. Animal Behaviour, 35, 722–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80108-2